How To Use A Traditional QA Testing Team To Emulate Agile Development

To keep up with the ever-changing agile development process, some organizations may feel they need to abandon their traditional quality assurance (QA) team altogether. However, this is not always necessary. Using a QA team in conjunction with an agile methodology can benefit both organizations and developers. Here we will discuss using a traditional QA team to emulate agile development. Traditional QA vs. Agile Development

 

Differences between traditional quality assurance and agile development methodologies

– A traditional QA team is structured to test a software after it has been written. A tester will typically verify that all features work as they should before handing off the product to customers.

– An agile development team is structured to test software as it is written. Developers write the code and unit tests upfront, which other developers then review before they even make it into the hands of testers.

– Traditional QA processes tend to treat all defects as equal. They don’t differentiate between a “critical” defect and a “functional” bug.

– Agile development processes typically view critical defects as the top priority. All other bugs are addressed afterward, though not necessarily in sequential order an netflix account.

 

Approach #1: Embrace agile QA practices while having a separate testing group for traditional practices

One possible approach to emulate an agile QA team is to use traditional QA practices such as regression testing and verification on a separate branch or product release. This approach helps to ensure that all the “traditional” stuff gets tested, but it still allows developers to work in an agile manner by letting them continue to test and iterate their code as they go.

 

Approach#2: Make developers responsible for QA

This approach moves the traditional QA role into the developer’s seat. As long as there is a thorough review before code is pushed to production, developers can test their code and fix defects simultaneously. This allows them to receive immediate feedback on what they have built, which leads to better code. It also eliminates bottlenecks that come with going through traditional QA, meaning developers can fix bugs faster bike of kawasaki.

 

Approach #3: Maintain QA as a separate group for each story/task

Another approach is to maintain the split of responsibilities where developers test their tasks and submit them for review upon completion, as discussed in Approach #2. QA then tests those stories and notifies the team of any bugs they find for that sprint/iteration before releasing them.

The benefits of each approach:

  • An agile QA process allows developers to continue receiving feedback on their work being created and tested. This reduces the time spent fixing problems, which results in reduced costs.
  • Maintaining two separate groups (one for traditional QA practices and one for agile development) is typically more costly than employing any of the above options. However, if your organization values formal processes, this may be easier to manage and sell to management/senior leadership.
  • Allowing developers to maintain QA responsibilities can negatively affect project flow, but it allows the team to work faster and more efficiently without sacrificing quality.

 

Whether you choose to add agile development practices into your current QA processes, the most important part is getting started. Make a plan, get everyone on the same page, and find a way to use agile development for quality assurance.

 

Final thoughts

It will take time for everyone to adjust their mindset and processes as with anything new. Be patient. It’s important to remember that you’re trying to improve the way your team works together, not overhauling everything overnight.

As your team(s) become more comfortable with this new approach, you can slowly release some of these changes. At first, not all projects or teams may want to do things differently. That’s okay! It will take time for everyone to adjust to the idea of using agile QA practices in their current QA process. The goal is to let people choose what they want to work with, not force them into anything.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.